🔗 Share this article

Former President Donald Trump has repeatedly shown his wish to see opponents probed, exerting pressure on the DOJ to charge ex FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James.

"We can't delay any longer, it's damaging our standing and trustworthiness," the president stated recently in a social media post.

"They impeached twice, and indicted me (5 times!)" he said, mentioning the four criminal cases he encountered after departing the White House in 2021 and James's lawsuit.

Both have since been charged, in cases that numerous specialists have stated appear to be politically motivated and difficult to win in court.

But the latest allegations against a Trump critic, former national security adviser John Bolton, differ significantly, legal experts and former prosecutors assert.

"In my opinion, contrasting Bolton's charges to James' is like comparing two different things," stated Mark Lesko, a ex federal prosecutor for the Eastern District of New York.

The Details of Bolton's Legal Situation

Bolton has been criminally indicted on federal charges pertaining to the supposed mishandling of sensitive materials. Since departing the White House in 2019, he has emerged as a outspoken presidential opponent, going so far as to describe him "stunningly uninformed" and unsuitable for office in his memoir.

Experts contend that while there may be political reasons to go after Bolton, the procedures used to obtain an charge and the proof compiled against him suggest a potentially stronger legal argument than the Justice Department presented against James.

"These actions that's being claimed is simultaneously more severe and appears to have taken place over a significant duration," said Carissa Byrne Hessick, a academic at the University of North Carolina School of Law.

During his tenure as Trump's national security adviser, and after his 2019 White House exit, authorities claimed that Bolton placed the nation at risk by wrongfully retaining and transmitting sensitive documents to relatives using unprotected methods, including AOL. Some of the documents were labeled top secret.

The charge states that at a certain time a unauthorized user accessed to Bolton's system where documents were stored and transmitted an seeming threat to cause "the biggest controversy since Hillary [Clinton]'s emails were leaked".

Bolton entered a not guilty plea during a court appearance on recently to 18 distinct counts of improperly handling sensitive materials.

Retribution or a Strong Case?

The schedule of his charge - coming on the tails of allegations against James - has revived questions about external influence on the legal system.

Trump previously suggested Bolton belonged in jail, and called him a "disreputable person". Bolton, for his part, wrote a publication about his time in the Trump administration that was sharply negative of the president.

"There's no question that the timing of this charge, when combined with additional cases, has prompted doubts about the strength of these charges, and why these counts are being brought at this time," stated Jamil Jaffer, founder and executive director of the National Security Institute.

However, he added, "should the DOJ is capable to prove the facts alleged and show the material is properly designated, his behavior may very well have violated the law".

Charging such a high-ranking official for mishandling classified documents is "uncommon" but not unprecedented, said Carrie Cordero, a senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security.

"Cases that involve classified information present challenges to try, but they may and are filed against both low-level and senior officials, from occasionally," she explained.

Parallels to Investigations into Trump and President

Trump likewise faced allegations of wrongfully storing classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago property in Florida and obstructing their recovery, but that case was ultimately dismissed by a federal judge and voided by his return as leader.

A special counsel additionally determined that former President Joe Biden improperly stored sensitive materials from his period as vice president, but did not prosecute him.

Bolton's case shares characteristics to Biden's classified documents matters, noted Mr Lesko, who also held a top security role at the DOJ.

Strict procedures regulate the handling of classified documents. To secure a conviction, the prosecution must prove that Bolton was aware the information he was transmitting was restricted, and he had to knowingly transmit it to someone not entitled to receive it.

"Because of the classified nature of the information at issue in this case, we lack a lot of particulars about why the government believes things like the diary entries and the other material he shared by email, and why there were restricted," said Mr Jaffer.

A Increasingly Conventional Prosecution

The procedure by which the Justice Department initiated this case will be closely examined, after Trump openly posted his desire to see his political opponents charged and several of those indictments materialized.

But Mr Lesko said in Bolton's case, authorities appear to have adhered to standard procedure.

"The Bolton prosecution and eventually the charge appeared to have observed the regular process including the regulations and standards within the Department of Justice," he said.

In contrast to Comey's short, concise indictment, Bolton's was a increasingly "conventional" document that "explicitly outlines the details concerning the circumstances and circumstances in this instance," Mr Lesko commented.

"It seems fairly consistent with a long line of cases... where public servants improperly handled and shared sensitive information."